Plain v. Plain
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages from his wife for loss of consortium resulting from her own negligence. In the same action her children sue for loss of services and companionship. The trial court denied the mother’s motion to strike these claims from the pleadings under Rule 12, Rules of Civil Procedure, but certified the question as important and doubtful.
We reverse.
Since there has been no trial the allegations of the complaint, for purposes of a Rule 12 motion, are taken as correct.
On or about June 8, 1973, on Highway No. 52 east of Donnybrook, North Dakota, defendant was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. KelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Beaudette v. FranaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Miller v. MonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Eschenbach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Salin v. KloempkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Clark v. Estate of Rice Ex Rel. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Ascheman v. Village of HancockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- McIntosh v. BarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.