Legal Opinion
Kunaknana v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1984No. 84-3623PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
742 F.2d 1145
21 ERC 1699, 14 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,827
Sarah KUNAKNANA and Jean Numnik, Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
William CLARK, Secretary of the Interior, and the United
States Department of the Interior, Defendants/Appellees,
and
Amoco Production Company; Arco Alaska, Inc.; Getty Oil
Company; Shell Oil Company; and Texaco, Inc.,
Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants.
Nos. 83-4325, 84-3623.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 16, 1984.
Decided Sept. 10, 1984.
Opinion Filed Sept. 12, 1984.
Donald Cooper, James Bamberger, Alaska Legal Services Corp., Anchorage, Alaska, for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Great Basin Mine Watch v. HankinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sudomir v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Haynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.