Legal Opinion
Sudomir v. McMahon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 1985No. 84-2077PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction by three aliens who challenge the denial by the California Department of Social Services (the Department) of welfare benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. Each of the three has applied for, but not yet received, political asylum. In essence, the aliens contend that the pertinent legislation and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment entitle them to receive AFDC benefits. We affirm.1
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
The AFDC program is a cooperative…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sandoval-Luna v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Monica Navarro Pimentel v Susan DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jorge Alberto Hernandez-Mezquita v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.