Legal Opinion

United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1985No. 84-3552PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

The United States brought this action on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). The FTC sought a civil penalty assessment against Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (“L-P”) for L-P’s failure to comply with a consent order entered by the FTC. L-P filed a counterclaim alleging that the FTC had violated section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(b), by refusing to reopen the consent order after L-P had petitioned for reopening. The district court granted the FTC’s motion for a summary judgment on the counterclaim and ultimately assessed a civil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Keith Dwayne GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. George Dadanian and Jean DadanianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Bobby Ray WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Lasco Lavaun HurtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API