Legal Opinion

Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Medical Foundation CA3

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2015No. C073677PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J. —

In this action for disability discrimination and wrongful termination, we affirm a summary judgment in favor of the defendant employer. We do so largely because the plaintiff employee’s alleged disability — an inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s standard oversight of job performance — is not a disability recognized in the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Summary Judgment Standard of Review

“The aim of the summary judgment procedure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kailikole v. Palomar Cmty. Coll. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  2. (PS) King v. CA Dept. of Water ResourcesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Bliss v. City of Indio CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Do v. Raytheon Company CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Faulkner v. Lucille Packard Salter Children's HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API