Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Medical Foundation CA3
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J. —
In this action for disability discrimination and wrongful termination, we affirm a summary judgment in favor of the defendant employer. We do so largely because the plaintiff employee’s alleged disability — an inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s standard oversight of job performance — is not a disability recognized in the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Summary Judgment Standard of Review
“The aim of the summary judgment procedure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kailikole v. Palomar Cmty. Coll. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- (PS) King v. CA Dept. of Water ResourcesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Bliss v. City of Indio CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Do v. Raytheon Company CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Faulkner v. Lucille Packard Salter Children's HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.