Legal Opinion

Bliss v. City of Indio CA4/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 2016No. E061938Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 2/3/16 Bliss v. City of Indio CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO JAMES BLISS, Plaintiff and Appellant, E061938 v. (Super.Ct.No. PSC1302116) CITY OF INDIO, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Richmond v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API