Legal Opinion
Barrows v. Faulkner
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 7, 1971No. 70-C-120PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Defendants Faulkner and his surety, Western Surety Company, move for summary judgment on the ground that Faulkner did not direct nor did he personally participate in the events giving rise to this action by Plaintiff under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Plaintiff resists the Motion and requests the Court to retain the claim against Defendant Faulkner and his surety on the basis that they are liable to Plaintiff pursuant to the terms of 19 Okl.St.Ann. § 547.
The basis upon which the rule cited by Defendant Faulkner rests is that the doctrine of respondeat superior does not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Karen Jean Hymer v. Benjamin K. Chal and Victoria Leilani ChaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Sanberg v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Wojtas v. Village of NilesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- David Moor v. Frank I. Madigan, William Donovan Rundle, Jr., a Minor, by William D. Rundle, His Guardian Ad Litem v. Frank I. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Richardson v. SnowDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Smith v. WicklineDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.