Legal Opinion
Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1966No. 66 Civil 267PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
This is an action by a commercial factor, in its capacity as assignee of an insured, to recover for a loss allegedly sustained within the terms of a contract of insurance made with The Foreign Credit Insurance Association (F.C.I.A.) and the Export-Import Bank of Washington (Exim Bank). F.C.I.A., allegedly an association of and representative for a number of insurance companies named as defendants and denominated “insurers”, is alleged to be Exim Bank’s agent for the issuance of the contract of insurance sued on. Exim Bank concededly is a wholly-owned Government…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Barrows v. FaulknerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1971
- Simon & Flynn, Inc. v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Brame v. Ray Bills Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Lance International, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.