Legal Opinion
Smith v. Wickline
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 23, 1975No. Civ.-75-0204-EPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
EUBANKS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, parents of a minor son killed as a result of being shot with a shotgun allegedly unjustifiably fired by the defendant WICKLINE, seek redress by way of damages, inter alia, for the deprivation under color of the Statutes of the State of Oklahoma, of rights, privileges and immunities secured to them by the Constitution of the United States.
Pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., both defendants move the Court to dismiss this action on several grounds, which will receive separate consideration below.
The allegations of the complaint,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Hattie Brazier v. W. B. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Berry v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Andrew Sims v. C. L. Adams, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Rosa v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Jones v. HildebrantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.