Legal Opinion
Legge v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 6, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 64-836PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to the provisions contained in 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321-2325, 49 U.S.C.A. § 17(9) and 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009 and § 25 of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended.
It is brought here by George W. Leg-ge1 and Cooperative Legislative Committee, Railroad Brotherhoods in the State of Pennsylvania, as plaintiffs, and based upon a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting the application of the defendant, Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company, to remove 46 interlocking signals, switch machines from all switches,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Tom's Express, Inc. v. Division of State Highway PatrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Shein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Shein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Florida East Coast Railway Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1966
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967