Legal Opinion

Setzer v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 27, 1942PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, J.:

The legislature of 1941 enacted Chapter 20496 defining and prohibiting the manufacture, possession, or sale of “Filled Milk.” The pertinent part of Section 1 of the Act is as follows:

“That the term . “Filled Milk” means any milk, cream, or skimmed milk, whether or not condensed, evaporated, concentrated, powdered, dried or desiccated, to which has been added, or which has been blended or compounded with, any fat or oil other than milk fat, whether in bulk or in containers, hermeti cally. sealed or unsealed; provided, that this definition shall not be held or construed to mean or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Carolene Products Co. v. MohlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Agrico Chemical Co. v. STATE, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Reesman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Vandiver v. VincentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Sage Stores Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API