Legal Opinion

Carolene Products Co. v. Mohler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1940No. 34,307PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This action was to enjoin the defendants as state officials from enforcing the statute known- as the “filled-milk” act. Judgment was for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The so-called filled-milk statute, being paragraph 2, subdivision F of G. S. 1935, 65-707, reads:

“It shall be unlawful to manufacture, sell, keep for sale, or have in possession with intent to sell or exchange, any milk, cream, skim milk, buttermilk, condensed or evaporated milk, powdered milk, condensed skim milk, or any of the fluid derivatives of any of them to which has been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  4. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Reesman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Marks v. FrantzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Parker v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API