Legal Opinion
Reesman v. State
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1968No. 39941PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
The trial court declared pertinent portions of RCW 15.38 (Filled Dairy Products Act) unconstitutional, and enjoined the Director of Agriculture from enforcing the act against Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Reesman, doing business as Reesman’s Dairy. The state of Washington and the Director of Agriculture have appealed. We reverse the judgment.
The respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Reesman, own and operate a dairy plant in Toppenish, Washington. Their products are distributed generally in. the Yakima area, and retailed in part through their own drive-in outlets. In the course of their operation they acquired a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.