Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Little Machine Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1995No. 95-1221Published

1Opinion of the Court

68 F.3d 1113

Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,397

Ronald ANDERSON; Mary Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

American National Can Corporation, Intervenor-Plaintiff,

v.

F.J. LITTLE MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant,

Allied Products Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1221.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 14, 1995.

Decided Oct. 27, 1995.

John Simon, argued, St. Louis, Missouri, for appellants.

Mark Hellner, argued, Chicago, Illinois (Ian P. Cooper and B. Michelle Ward, St. Louis, Missouri, on the brief), for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

JOHN…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API