Legal Opinion
Oriental Realty Co. v. Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1912No. 9944PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered April £9, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an accounting, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to secure an accounting and a division of real estate held in the name of the defendants Taylor and wife. On a trial of the case, the court granted the relief prayed for. The defendants Taylor and wife have appealed.
It appears that, in December, 1894, the defendants H. C. Taylor and D. F. McConnaughey entered into a written agreement, as follows:
“Whereas, H. C. Taylor and D. F. McConnaughey are about to enter into the business of buying at tax sales and dealing in tax titles;
“It is therefore mutually agreed between said parties that the said H. C.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seymour v. FreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Miller & Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Constanti v. BarovicWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Armand DeFelice v. State of Washington, Employment Security Dept.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- DeFelice v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015