Miller & Co. v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Corporation Court of the city of Staunton. Decree for complainant. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.
In the year 1901, H. Clay Miller, appellant, entered into a *477partnership with one Bradley for the establishment and conduct of a retail dry goods business in the city of Staunton, Miller contributing the capital to conduct the business, and Bradley his labor and services. In the same store they had a “ready-to-wear” department from the inception of their business, and the business proved successful. In the fall of 1903, Miller bought out Bradley’s interest in the entire business, and thereafter conducted it, including the “ready-to-wear” department, under the style of H. Clay Miller & Co., and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cothran v. Marmaduke & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Lengle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Jackson v. Haynie's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Jones v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phœnix Oil Co. v. McLarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ewers v. MontgomeryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Ennis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
- Moore v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Oriental Realty Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.