Legal Opinion
Bisco’s, Inc v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1976No. 55952, (Calendar No. 9)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
(to reverse and remand). The facts of this case 1 have been adequately outlined by my Brother, Justice Levin. The issues raised are essentially the same as those resolved today in Bundo v Walled Lake, 395 Mich 679; 238 NW2d 154 (1975)._
In Bundo we held that an individual seeking a renewal of a class C liquor license under § 17 of the Michigan Liquor Control Act (MLCA) 2 has an "interest” in "property” such that he is entitled to due process protection. For the reasons set forth in Bundo we find the plaintiff, as a liquor licensee, is entitled to due process protection in seeking renewal of a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- R.S.W.W., Inc., D/B/A Goose Island Brewery v. City of Keego HarborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Wojcik v. City of RomulusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Matto's, Inc. v. Olde Colonie Place (In Re Matto's, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Abraham Shamie, Cross-Appellant v. City of Pontiac, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.