Legal Opinion

Appel v. Burman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1984No. Civ. 66879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Nature of Appeal:

Appellants claim that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting respondents a declaratory judgment on the issue of the location of the actual boundary between the parties’ properties and awarding respondents special damages, attorneys fees and costs as recompense for the disparagement of title they suffered at the hands of appellants.

Summary of Facts and Procedure:

Appellants and respondents are neighbors involved in a boundary dispute. In June 1980 respondents informed appellants that respondents intended to construct an addition to their home. In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. McElligott v. FreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Glass v. Gulf Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Sumner Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Rio Mesa Holdings, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  4. Manhattan Loft, LLC v. Mercury Liquors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Truck Ins. Exchange v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API