Legal Opinion
Fernandez v. Admirand
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1992No. 21620PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Facts
In June, 1983, Roman P. Fernandez (Fernandez) first sought medical treatment from Michael K. Daines, M.D. (Dr. Daines), a physician who was board certified in internal medicine. Fernandez was a forty-nine year old Filipino male with a three-year history of peptic ulcer disease and gastrointestinal (G.I.) bleeding.
On January 24, 1984, Fernandez returned to Dr. Daines and told him that, when he had a bowel movement, he had black, tarry stools along with bright red blood. That same day, Dr. Daines had Fernandez admitted to St. Mary’s Hospital, and the nursing progress notes indicated…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Perez v. Las Vegas Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Vancheri v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Nevada Industrial Development, Inc. v. BenedettiNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Sims v. General Telephone & ElectronicsNevada Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Hallmark v. EldridgeNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Mulder v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Banks Ex Rel. Banks v. Sunrise Hosp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.