Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Heer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2007No. 45571PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we interpret the statutory provisions that require a seller of residential property to disclose any defects to a buyer of that property. Respondent Scott Heer contended that appellant Judy Nelson sold him a cabin without complying with NRS 113.130 because she failed to disclose prior water damage that may have caused elevated amounts of mold within the cabin. Under NRS 113.140, however, a seller of residential property is required to disclose to potential buyers only those defects of which the seller is aware. NRS 113.100(1) defines “defect”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Chowdhry v. NLVH, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Frantz v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Foster v. DingwallNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Winchell v. SchiffNevada Supreme Court · 2008

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API