Nelson v. Heer
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Hardesty, J.:
In this appeal, we interpret the statutory provisions that require a seller of residential property to disclose any defects to a buyer of that property. Respondent Scott Heer contended that appellant Judy Nelson sold him a cabin without complying with NRS 113.130 because she failed to disclose prior water damage that may have caused elevated amounts of mold within the cabin. Under NRS 113.140, however, a seller of residential property is required to disclose to potential buyers only those defects of which the seller is aware. NRS 113.100(1) defines “defect”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
- McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Chowdhry v. NLVH, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Frantz v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Foster v. DingwallNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Winchell v. SchiffNevada Supreme Court · 2008
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.