Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. Eldridge

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. 46722PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this appeal, we consider the extent to which biomechanical engineers may testify concerning damage claims in personal injury matters 2 and clarify the standards for appellate review concerning the adequacy of damage awards based upon the erroneous admission of evidence.

We conclude that (1) the district court below abused its discretion when it allowed a physician with an engineering background to testify as a biomechanical expert against a personal injury plaintiff because, among other reasons, the testimony did not assist the jury in understanding the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Means v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Morales v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Higgs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Williams v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Perez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. YeghiazarianNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. LoperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API