Legal Opinion

Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1998No. 64023-8PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Pinch’s Deli seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision reinstating Lori Schooley’s personal injury action after dismissal on summary judgment. At issue is whether Pinch’s Deli can be liable for injuries suffered by Schooley as a result of the store’s illegal sale of alcohol to another minor who in turn gave the alcohol to Schooley. We conclude it can and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On August 25, 1989, Russell Bowser invited five of his friends, all of whom were under 21, over for a party while his parents were out of town. Everyone at the party wanted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API