Legal Opinion

Griffin v. West RS, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2001No. 68911-3PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

The principal question is whether, or to what extent, a residential landlord is legally obliged to protect its tenants from the foreseeable criminal acts of third persons. But this question we need not answer as the jury here found the landlord’s negligence was not a proximate cause of the tenant’s injuries in any event. We therefore reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the tenant’s claim.

I

FACTS

Christie Griffin lived alone in a large residential apartment complex managed by West RS, Inc., d/b/a Trammell Crow Residential Services (Trammell Crow). In early…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Micro Enhancement v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Micro Enhancement International, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. South v. McCarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Pacheco v. AmesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. City of Bremerton v. WidellWashington Supreme Court · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API