Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Dana Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1998No. CA 97-1539PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Margaret Meads, Judge.

Appellant, James Boyd, appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that denied his claim for benefits on the finding that he failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his carpal tunnel syndrome was caused by rapid repetitive motion. The Commission also found that appeEant failed to prove the aEeged compensable injury is the major cause of his disability or need for treatment.

Boyd, a forty-six-year-old man who has diabetes, worked for appeUee for sixteen years. In May 1995 he noticed numbness and tingling in his right hand. He continued to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Wright v. ABC Air, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Wade v. Mr. C. Cavenaugh'sCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Lay v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Price v. Little Rock Packaging Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Hiland DairyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Patterson v. Frito Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Coleman v. Pro Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Stephenson v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API