Legal Opinion
(PC) Randolph v. Hall
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 31, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01434Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:20-cv-01434-JLT-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF 13 v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 14 HALL, et al., (Doc. 31) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Colin M. Randolph seeks to hold Defendants liable for violations of his civil right 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. Introduction 20 On October 11, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s 21 request for the appointment of counsel. (Doc. 28.)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Computer Economics, Inc. v. Gartner Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1999
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2000