Legal Opinion
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 22, 2010No. C 09-2292 VRWPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge.
On January 15, 2010, defendant-intervenors, the official proponents of Proposition 8 (“proponents”) moved to compel production of documents from three nonparties: Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights (“CAEBR”), Equality California and No on Proposition 8, Campaign for Marriage Equality, A Project of the American Civil Liberties Union (the “ACLU”) (collectively the “No on 8 groups”). Doc # 472. The court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Spero pursuant to 28 USC § 636(b)(1)(A) on February 4, 2010. Doc #572. The magistrate heard argument on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peters' BakeryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Frye v. Warden, San Quentin State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- (PC) Randolph v. HallDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Alma Martinez Cruz v. Todd Lyons et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.