Legal Opinion

Kleine-Albrandt v. Lamb

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1992No. 53A05-9201-CV-21PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Stephanie Kleine-Albrandt appeals from a judgment against both Carl Lamb and Fitness and Exercise, Inc. ("F/X") which awarded Kleine-Albrandt damages and costs pursuant to Ind.Code § 22-2-5-2, but which did not assess attorney's fees. We reverse.

Kleine-Albrandt raises the following dis-positive issue on appeal:

Whether I1.C. § 22-2-5-2 grants the trial court discretion to deny attorney's fees to a nonprofit legal organization representing a prevailing plaintiff.

The facts before this court are limited as the parties waived a record of the evidence presented in small claims…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Darmetko v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Midland-Guardian Co. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Fardy v. Physicians Health Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Pinnacle Properties v. SaulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re the Marriage of MalquistMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. PAYDAY TODAY, INC. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Amir Basic v. Mohammad Alsam Chaudhry (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API