Legal Opinion

Cain v. Transocean Offshore USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2008No. 05-30963PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to consider the continued viability of our longstanding precedent holding that a watercraft under construction is not a “vessel in navigation” for purposes of the Jones Act. We hold that the Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company, 543 U.S. 481, 125 S.Ct. 1118, 160 L.Ed.2d 932 (2005), has not effectively overruled that precedent because the decision did not concern or address the point at which a vessel-to-be actually becomes a vessel. We therefore REVERSE the district court’s denial of summary judgment and REMAND for further…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. People's Ferry Company of Boston v. BeersSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  5. The Robert W. ParsonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. Transocean Enterprise, Inc. v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Vinson v. American Bureau of Shipping, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Romero v. Cajun Stabilizing Boats Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API