Legal Opinion

Muncrief v. Memorial Hospital of Southern Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1988No. 65306PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court’s three-judge review panel correctly proceeded on remand of the claim by the Court of Appeals’ when it reexamined the record and sustained the trial judge’s decision denying benefits to the claimant. We answer in the affirmative.

Margaret Muncrief [claimant] sought benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act1 [Act] after she allegedly contracted an occupational disease. The trial judge denied her benefits. He found that she neither sustained an accidental injury nor contracted a disease that was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. George E. Failing Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Parker v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. McDonald v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API