Legal Opinion

Low Cost Cars, Inc. v. Munn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1981No. 79-292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case began as one by Robert E. Munn against Low Cost Cars, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a Smith Motor Company, for damages on account of misrepresentation and breach of warranty concerning a motor vehicle. Then, Chrysler Corporation was added as a defendant as to the breach of warranty claim. Subsequently, a counterclaim was filed by Low Cost against Munn for a deficiency, resulting from resale upon repossession, on the promissory note given upon purchase of the vehicle. Following that, Munn amended, claiming that Low Cost repossessed the vehicle in such a fashion as to amount to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beloit Corp. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Weaver v. O'Meara Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Atlas Shirt Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Miller v. DacovichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGrady v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  2. Stone v. Cloverleaf Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Underwood v. First Ala. Bank of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Lavender v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Underwood v. Coffee County BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API