Legal Opinion
United States v. Fleet Factors Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided May 12, 1993No. Civ. A. CV687-070PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
BOWEN, District Judge.
This Memorandum of Opinion sets forth the Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) conclusions of law following a non-jury trial of the captioned case. 1 In this action brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75, the United States of America (“Government”) seeks to recover from Fleet Factors Corporation (“Fleet”), 2 Clifford Horowitz, and Murray Newton the response and enforcement costs associated with a hazardous substance removal. 3 For the reasons stated below, Fleet is liable…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. First City National Bank of HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Tanglewood East Homeowners Jimmie D. Lee, Jr. v. Charles-Thomas, Inc., First Federal Savings & Loan Association of ConroeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chatham Steel Corp. v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
- Superior Consulting Co. v. WallingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace Indus., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- State of NY v. Almy Bros., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Premium Plastics v. LaSalle National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.