Legal Opinion

Pactiv Corp. v. Menasha Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 9, 2003No. 02 C 9245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLDERMAN, District Judge.

On March 12, 2003, plaintiff Pactiv Corporation (“Pactiv”) filed its three count amended complaint against defendants Menasha Corporation, Menasha Packaging Corporation, LLC (collectively, “Mena-sha”) and Bill Baumgartner (“Baumgart-ner”). Count I alleges a breach of a contact claim against Menasha for hiring Baumgartner in violation of a confidentiality agreement between Pactiv and Menasha dated April 6, 2000. Count II seeks in-junctive relief and damages agáinst Baum-gartner individually and arising from an alleged breach of a December…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. MagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pampered Chef v. AlexanianDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Footlick v. Topstep LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  3. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  4. Tradesmen International, Incor v. John BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Tradesmen International, Incor v. John BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API