Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tradesmen International, Incor v. John Black

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 2013No. 11-3715, 12-2032Published

1ConcurrenceHamilton, Circuit Judge

I join the court’s opinion in full. I write separately to emphasize both the importance of the choice-of-law issues in covenant-not-to-compete litigation and the under-appreciated consequences of courts’ willingness in many states to rewrite unreasonable covenants so as to enforce a reasonable but fictional covenant, one that the parties might have made but did not actually make.

At a superficial level, many states adopt the same broad principles in deciding whether and how to enforce an employee’s covenant not to compete with a prior employer. Such contracts are considered to be in restraint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. House of Vision, Inc. v. HiyaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Curtis 1000, Incorporated v. Roy H. Suess and American Business Forms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Mercury Partners 90 BI, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API