Legal Opinion

Ciampa 21, LLC v. QBE Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant QBE Insurance Corporation is obligated to defend and indemnify Ciampa 21, LLC, in an underlying action entitled Pacheco v Ciampa 21, LLC, commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 31686/04, the defendant QBE Insurance Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Iannacci, J.), entered February 2, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment, in effect, declaring that it is not so obligated and granted the plaintiff s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that it is so obligated.

Or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Sputnik Restaurant Corp. v. United National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Quality Investors, Ltd. v. Lloyd's London, EnglandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fine Line Builders & Remodelers, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Lancer Insurance v. Super Value, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Lancer Insurance v. Super Value, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API