Legal Opinion
Quality Investors, Ltd. v. Lloyd's London, England
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover under an insurance policy, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter Patsalos, J.), dated August 18, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The requirement that an insured comply with the notice provision of an insurance policy operates as a condition precedent to coverage (see Security Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 NY2d 436, 440 [1972]; Viggiano v Encompass Ins. Co./Fireman’s Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J., 6 AD3d 695…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Power Authority v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Travelers Insurance v. Volmar Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Blue Ridge Insurance v. JiminezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Viggiano v. Encompass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sputnik Restaurant Corp. v. United National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kahn v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ciampa 21, LLC v. QBE InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Schaefer AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006