Legal Opinion
Fine Line Builders & Remodelers, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company (hereinafter Atlantic), established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that it properly disclaimed coverage on the ground of late notice of the underlying accident (see Ciampa 21, LLC v QBE Ins. Corp., 81 AD3d 586 [2011]; Lobosco v Best Buy, Inc., 80 AD3d 728 [2011]; Bigman Bros., Inc. v QBE Ins. Corp., 73 AD3d 1110, 1112 [2010]; Sputnik Rest. Corp. v United Natl. Ins. Co., 62 AD3d 689 [2009]; St. James Mech., Inc. v Royal & Sunalliance, 44 AD3d 1030, 1032 [2007]; Felix v Pinewood Bldrs., Inc., 30 AD3d 459…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- St. James Mechanical, Inc. v. Royal & SunallianceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Magistro v. Buttered Bagel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sputnik Restaurant Corp. v. United National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Guideone Insurance v. Darkei Noam Rabbinical CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014