Legal Opinion

Sputnik Restaurant Corp. v. United National Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 2009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to a commercial liability insurance policy, the plaintiffs appeal, and the defendants Giacomo Camarda and Raffaela Camarda separately appeal, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated May 15, 2008, which granted the motion of the defendant United National Insurance Company for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify them in an action entitled Camarda v Esquire Diner, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under index No.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Argo Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ponok Realty Corp. v. United National Specialty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. McGovern-Barbash Associates, LLC v. Everest National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Bigman Brothers, Inc. v. QBE InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Konig v. Hermitage InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Tower Insurance v. AlvaradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API