Legal Opinion

People v. Heinrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1924No. Crim. No. 1049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant was charged by indictment with an attempt to commit grand larceny. From a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for new trial defendant has appealed to this court.

In brief, the evidence shows that defendant advertised in a newspaper for a superintendent to take charge of a large ranch at a salary of $350 per month and a percentage of the income from the ranch, and requiring that such superintendent deposit with defendant a cash bond. A Mr. Crandell, who was a detective in the office of the district attorney, answered the advertisement. Later Mr. Crandell met…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. . MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  4. People v. KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Drake v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API