Legal Opinion

People v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1884No. 10,955PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing anew trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.

The defendant was accused of the crime of embezzlement, the charge contained in the information being that “ said John S. Gray, on the 8th day of December, A. d. 1882, at said city and county of San Francisco, State of California, was the duly appointed, qualified and acting secretary, clerk and servant of certain State officers of said State of California, to wit, of the Board of State Harbor Commissioners (otherwise known and designated as the State Board of Harbor Commissioners), then and there duly appointed, qualified and acting as such board aforesaid, under and by virtue of the laws of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. People v. HaunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
  4. People v. Ah WeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Blandford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1881

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API