Legal Opinion

Reinprecht v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 3, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

This is a writ of certiorari to review the Industrial Commission’s refusal to grant petitioner’s request for the issuance of subpoenas for two physicians to testify at the hearing on his claim. We find the Commission was in error and set aside the award.

The physicians, Drs. Willard Hunter and Howard Aidem, had previously examined petitioner and their medical reports were on file with the Commission at the time of the request for subpoenas. These reports had been filed by respondents, who also requested subpoenas for the two doctors, and who stated in their letter to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Walker Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Polston v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cash v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Scheytt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. K Mart Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API