Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 11, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was laid off from his full-time employment on January 29, 2003, but continued to work at a part-time position for another employer until February 3, 2003, when he quit that part-time position. He subsequently filed for unemployment insurance benefits for both positions. Previously, this Court determined that there was substantial evidence to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GruberNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ShamilovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Matter of Vargas (Mason ESC LLC--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API