Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Alm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 3, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits for certain dates because she was not totally unemployed.

Claimant, a licensed massage therapist, applied for and obtained partial unemployment insurance benefits in October 1997 when the physical therapy business where she worked as a massage therapist experienced a lack of work. On her initial application for benefits, she answered affirmatively the question of whether she was engaged in activity which…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Di Maria v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In Re the Claim of ValvoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In re the Claim of O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of DeOliveiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of Roberson (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. In re the Claim of RaspalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of SpanglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API