Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1965No. L. A. No. 28120PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Bradford A. Arthur, an attorney at law, seeks a writ of certiorari to review an order of the respondent court holding him in contempt.

On the morning of April 17, 1964, Arthur had two matters pending before Judge Joseph Wapner in department 100 of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (the criminal master calendar department), one matter pending in department 101, and a jury deliberating in a case in department 107. Prior to 9:15 a.m., Arthur notified the clerk in 101 that he had two matters in department 100, that he intended to be present and would return shortly. After completing one of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In re ZerbeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lyons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. In Re LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cannon v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wenger v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API