Baylay v. Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Joan B. Gottschall, United States District Judge
Defendant Etihad Airways P.J.S.C. (“defendant”) moves pursuant to Federal Rule *701of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Counts I, II, and III of plaintiff Martyn Baylay’s Second Amended Complaint on the basis that these three counts are barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act (“IWCA”) [33]. In response, the plaintiff alleges that the IWCA has no preclusive effect upon his claims against the defendant because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) provides exclusive…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blazek v. ADT, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Blazek v. ADT, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Carnes v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025