Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2017No. CV-16-0126-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Under A.R.S. § 12-510, claims by governmental entities generally are not barred by statutes of limitations. For actions relating to real property, however, Arizona’s statute of repose provides that, “notwithstanding any other statute,” an action “based in contract” against certain identified parties must be filed within “eight years after substantial completion of the improvement of real property.” A.R.S. § 12-552(A). We hold that governmental entities’ contract-based actions (including claims for indemnification) that fall within §…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Uni-Sys., LLC v. U.S. Tennis Ass'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  2. Ariz. Chapter of the Associated Gen. Contractors of Am. v. City of Phx.Arizona Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Mohave County v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Zumar v. CaymusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API