Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 6, 1976No. 1476-2; 1439-2PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

A Grays Harbor jury convicted defendants Richard R. Rosi and Patrick Gillis Martin of delivery of a controlled substance, to wit, marijuana. Their appeals are consolidated here, and the issues raised by their assignments of error are: (1) sufficiency of the State’s evidence to prove either possession or delivery by defendant Martin; (2) sufficiency of the State’s evidence to prove that marijuana was a controlled substance; (3) whether defendants were denied equal protection of the law because the prosecuting attorney had discretion to charge the crime either as a felony under state law or as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. RoybalWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Chase v. Daily Record, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. VarelaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API