State v. Atchley

¶1 — Scott Vernon Atchley challenges his convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance, marijuana, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The trial court did not err by refusing to (1) *152compel the release of an informant’s name, (2) hold a Franks1 hearing on the allegedly false statements contained in the search warrant affidavit, or (3) suppress evidence derived from the search of his residence. Accordingly, we affirm.

Kulik, J.

*152FACTS

¶2 On July 26, 2005, Deputy Jack Rosenthal presented an affidavit for a search warrant for a suspected indoor marijuana grow…