Legal Opinion
State v. Atchley
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 18, 2007No. 25235-3-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
173 P.3d 323 (2007)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Scott Vernon ATCHLEY, Appellant.
No. 25235-3-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
December 18, 2007.
Kevin Michael Korsmo, Attorney at Law, Andrew J. Metts III, Spokane County Pros Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
Bevan Jerome Maxey, Maxey Law Offices PS, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
KULIK, J.
¶ 1 Scott Vernon Atchley challenges his convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance, marijuana, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The trial court did not err by refusing to: (1) compel the release of an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Anthony G. HouckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Aron Clark HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Brent LuysterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Danny Ray PottsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Mark Besola And Jeffrey SwensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.