Legal Opinion

Hampson v. Fall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Henry Hampson sued Thomas Eall in an action to recover possession of, and quiet the title to, certain real estate, viz.: “ Ten acres off of the south side of the north-east quarter of the south-east quarter of section thirty-three, in township seven, range eight; also lots numbered forty and forty-one in Peabody’s Addition to the town of North Vernon, in Jennings county, Indiana.”

On proper showing William Fall was made a codefendant.

Thomas Fall answered in general denial.

William Eall answered in general denial, and, in a second paragraph, by way of counter-claim, a statement of which we copy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. SpaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Keirsted v. AveryNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
  3. Brannon v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Blair v. BassIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
  5. Parmlee v. SloanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Shirk v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. North Western Mutual Life Insurance v. HeimannIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Catherwood v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API