Legal Opinion

North Western Mutual Life Insurance v. Heimann

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1884No. 10,377PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

— As creditor of William H. Fowler, appellee was made the beneficiary in a policy of insurance, issued by appellant, upon the life'of said Fowler. After the death of Fowler this action was brought upon that policy. Defence is made by the company upon alleged false answers in the application for the insurance. With the general verdict for appellee, the jury returned answers to interrogatories submitted by appellant.

With other reasons urged for a reversal of the judgment, are a refusal by the trial court to strike out and suppress one *25of these answers, and the overruling of appellant’s motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cushman v. United States Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Freeze v. DePuyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Louthain v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Elkhart Mutual Aid, Benevolent & Relief Ass'n v. HoughtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Meyer v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Shuck v. State ex rel. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API